Conservatives and their Bigotry

The latest few items to cross my social media threshold have gotten me a bit riled up … enough so to post. My “inner Grinch” has been tickled.

Racism may be one of the real problems with conservatives, and it continues to show, at least in the US.

Consider the recent Wall Street Journal piece (behind a pay wall, so see, for instance, this commentary). It basically bemoans how the country is in trouble because the WASPs aren’t in charge any more.

Or, consider the comments by Phil Robertson (Duck Dynasty) that included some racially insensitive comments, as well as the homophobic ones that have garnered so much press, including:

I never, with my eyes, saw the mistreatment of any black person. Not once. Where we lived was all farmers. The blacks worked for the farmers. I hoed cotton with them. I’m with the blacks, because we’re white trash. We’re going across the field…. I never heard one of them, one black person, say, ‘I tell you what: These doggone white people’—not a word!… Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues.

Ah, the good old days when Jim Crow ruled the land! Clearly our problems started when we gave “them” the right to vote.

A&E, the producers of the Duck Dynasty show, suspended Mr. Robertson. The conservatives —including Sarah Palin, Ted Cruz, Rush Limbaugh everyone on Fox News, and others — have jumped to Mr. Robertson’s defense while being careful not to mention the racist comments.

(As an aside, it strikes me as both illustrative and tragic that so many of these people — current and former lawmakers, many of whom are lawyers — label A&E’s suspension of Mr. Robertson as a violation of the 1st amendment. What a load! The 1st amendment says that the government will not do anything to infringe the free exercise of expression or religion — it says nothing about employers, media, or other private entities reacting to offensive comments. It is the same reason those blowhards can talk about a “war on Christmas” freely, even though it is utter nonsense. I would be outraged too, if the state or Federal government arrested or detained Mr. Robertson, but I applaud A&E’s decision to suspend him.)

Notably, Mr. Robertson’s defenders are the same people who are doing everything to make our first non-white President “fail” and who kept fixated on the idea that he couldn’t be an American (i.e., born in Kenya); who conjure up images of unemployed inner city “welfare queens” (i.e., black mothers) living off food stamps and unemployment insurance (which is incorrect in several dimensions); and are working at the state level to restrict voting to only the “right kind” couched as preventing (non-existent) voter fraud: basically a return to Jim Crow laws. Of course, Fox News reports it all with their unique spin… including stating that Jesus and Santa were white.

I am sure there are other examples, but those are so current and obvious.

This behavior needs to be called out for what it is. It is not a matter of religion or philosophy, unless you agree that the religion and philosophy espoused are based on racist ideals (e.g., the “Jesus was white” view).

Of course, racism isn’t the only contempt for “others” — conservatives are also really uncomfortable with any sexual identity other than straight male, and with poverty or bad luck of any kind. Basically, any existence other than their own desired state of being.

The sexism isn’t difficult to see, either: fear of women asserting themselves, making their own choices, having control of their sexuality. I’m not even bothering to include links — the examples are everywhere. The ultimate conservative nightmare is probably a wealthy black lesbian with a Spanish accent. I suspect the extreme conservatives are not that far from embracing the concept of public stoning of women who commit adultery or seek to have an education!

Meanwhile, these same conservatives rally around Christmas and religion, claiming they are good Christians (Muslims, Jews, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jainists, and atheists are all the heathen underclass, of course), while also expressing outrage that the new Pope is a Marxist for saying that the greed of the rich is a problem. Yet, their own Scripture (which they quote from so very selectively) states in Matthew 19:24 “And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.” And as they try to defund healthcare, food stamps, unemployment insurance and more, perhaps they should keep in mind their Matthew 25:40-45 (New International version; follow the link for other versions):

40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’

41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.

42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink,

43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’

44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’

45 “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’

Note that this does not mention the color of skin, or sex, or gender orientation. I guess Matthew was the first Marxist, eh?

I have separated from a few former friends who, among other things, refused to acknowledge any of the bigotry and ignorance present in the conservative movement (one, in particular, became a fan and apologist of Sarah Palin). I have several other acquaintances who claim to hate President Obama in every way, but deny any racist feelings. Pressed on this, they can’t point out why they have such a visceral dislike for the President, but invariably they come back with “I have several black friends” or “because he’s a socialist [sic].” They also can’t come up with good reasons why they are opposed to homosexuals other than it is an “icky choice” — showing ignorance in at least two dimensions. (1. There is increasing evidence it is not a choice, but an orientation from birth; and 2. all sex is icky if you don’t like it…viewpoint matters. Which reminds me of a favorite line by Woody Allen: “Is sex dirty? Only if it’s done right.”) A few of those people have tried to excuse notable individuals (e.g., the Koch brothers) by saying “You don’t know what they are doing individually” (as to charity or acceptance of others). No, but I can see what laws and candidates and causes they support. If they are not bigots then they are hypocrites of the worst kind.

I’m all for tolerance, but I can’t abide glorifying stupidity and bigotry. That may seem contradictory, but I never claimed I was perfect! I will not support government suppression of speech or religion (except in extreme cases — human sacrifice as a religious act is not something I support, unless it is Rush Limbaugh or Rick Santorum :-), but neither will I excuse it when it demonstrates continued acceptance of repression of others.

It’s Christmas. It is a time to celebrate family, peace, and joy. (Oh, and unbridled consumerism, too — spend all ye joyful. :-). Or, it is Saturnalia or Festivus, or Kwanzaa, or pick some other holiday. Whatever it may be, it is generally held to be a time to reflect on our own blessings and think of others.

Want to celebrate the true meaning of this holiday season? Find at least one family with limited income and buy them a holiday meal and toys for the children. Find some homeless people and treat them to a hot meal. (I advise against giving cash — too many homeless have addiction problems and they’ll spend it on their habits rather than their well-being, and some are actually scam artists.) Reluctant to engage with these people or don’t know where to find the needy ones? Then find a local food bank or other charity and make a substantial donation. (I now avoid the Salvation Army after my daughter pointed out their anti-LGBT stance; similar reasoning with most religious-based charities.)

And if you really want to carry the meaning of the holidays through the year, stop supporting bigots — whether they are on TV or running for office or preaching their brand of religion to you. Lend your voice — and your votes and support — to people who are not seeking to penalize or repress others simply because they aren’t white, or straight, or male, or healthy, or lucky. Odds are you or someone you love is, was, or will be one of those, so it is more than simply the right thing to do, it is the practical thing.

Happy Holidays.

Advertisements

9 Responses to “Conservatives and their Bigotry”

  1. Bob Spafford Says:

    Gene, Merry Xmas to you…I really enjoy your tweets (not sure what they mean sometimes), Keep up the good work.

    Bob Spafford

      BobS

    Like

  2. Skip Saunders Says:

    Gene, I often feel the disappointment associated with the continued exhibition of bigotry you so eloquently express. And, I too have noticed the prevalence of GOP, Tea Party, or Conservative participants in the expression of this bigotry. I wonder why the leaders and high visibility spokespeople for those groups fail to squelch the proliferation of hatred and bigotry that seems most frequently expressed by their members. I’m reluctant to paint ALL Conservatives as bigots, I somehow believe there is a chicken/egg question in play. Is it the bigots who seem to embrace conservatism? or is it the conservatives who seem to embrace bigots? I seldom agreed with William F. Buckley, but I often found his arguments educational. I wonder what a Conservative with Buckley’s acumen might present as a defense of the tolerance of bigotry within the current Conservative movements? Even more, I wonder if a Buckley might express sufficient outrage in terms understandable by conservatives capable of rational thought to distance bigotry acceptance from the Conservative movements. Somehow I think there are respectable Conservative voices someplace, but they are not being heard or considered among those organizations which claim to endorse Conservative values. It is almost as though there were a great divide among Conservatives: Those with education, and those without. Perhaps we are merely witnessing an intellectual drought period among Conservatives in which only those with weak minds or hypocrites emerge as their spokespeople?

    Like

  3. neuralcowboy Says:

    not difficult to agree with this. humans seem to have built-ins for (1) quick generalizing which works better in the face of maybe-it-s-a-tiger than thinking about things (2) prejudices, once formed, imprinted indelibly, forever (3) rationalizations, not recognized as such, pouring into the brain as the “real” reasons one holds one;s views (4) a good opinion of oneself once formed is not eroded by data (5) projection of one’s own attributes – being cheap onto Japanese, being money-hungry onto Jews, being prone to violence onto black males, being lascivious onto gays etc etc- all this suggests that 200,000 people signing a petition to get Moron Duck Merchandise back into a lousy fast food franchise is likely to continue.

    Like

  4. Laura Spafford Says:

    Loved this ! Merry Christmas,

    Laura Evelyn Spafford

    >

    Like

  5. David Bell Says:

    D’accord.

    Like

  6. Fred Ennis Says:

    Thanks for speaking out, Gene. As Edmund Burke reminded us, “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”

    Such commentary by people of intelligence, putting forward logical thought may offer impetus to help counter the well-financed mysterious force that propels the extreme views that only benefit those in society who are bleeding the poorest among. us to fuel their obscene wealth.

    Trust your “inner grinch” – he not only agrees with mine, but he speaks far more politely than mine.

    Like

  7. Robin Whitlock Says:

    Sir: we don’t correspond often but I do follow your work for several reasons. First we share ancestors (a happy accident). Second, I have a child studying at RIT who seems to be following a path you have long carved in the jungle of digital tech. And third, I like the way you think. I am a pastor of a small multi-everything congregation in Florida and I like your comments so much and believe they are a succinct statement that many of us share that I am printing your words for my adult education class this week so they can contemplate the truths of your reflections.(with full attribution of course). I did have the occasion to teach at three graduate schools for a total of about 15 years and, since I was teaching professional ethics, did have a chance to hear many a story about why ethics is unimportant in the world today which, of course, mostly masked excuses of why I should be able to get what I want when I want it and the world of standards be damned! Thank you for words and thoughts. If you ever need to escape to Florida (Tampa Bay Area) for a respite please know that we have a very nice guest room with access to many lovely out door places to visit. Robin Whitlock

    Like

    • spaf Says:

      Thank you — given your background, that is much appreciated.

      My uncle & family all used to live in St. Petersburg, so I know the area. They have passed on now, so I don’t have much calling to visit the area, but I will keep you mind.

      Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: